The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning

Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.

Author: Ed

  • OMTech 60 W Laser: Improved COB LED Shades

    OMTech 60 W Laser: Improved COB LED Shades

    Adding (fake) rivets to the COB LED shade brackets definitely improves their appearance:

    Acrylic COB LED Shade - installed
    Acrylic COB LED Shade – installed

    I cut new shades from vintage clear acrylic sheet, with more aluminized mylar attached to the lower surface: you can barely see the COB LED strip through the reflecting surface.

    Depending on how you arrange all the hardware hanging on the nozzle, the shades can collide with something at the home position in the far right corner:

    Acrylic COB LED Shade - X clearance
    Acrylic COB LED Shade – X clearance

    Definitely a step up from cardboard …

  • OMTech 60 W Laser: Head Alignment Puzzle

    OMTech 60 W Laser: Head Alignment Puzzle

    Having established that the laser beam comes out of the lens perpendicular to the honeycomb platform surface, this seemed peculiar:

    OMTech 60W beam alignment - head X plane
    OMTech 60W beam alignment – head X plane

    The mirror 3 + lens tube has a distinct tilt when seen from the +X direction (the right side of the machine, so it’s in the YZ plane, I suppose).

    This is not matched when seen from the -Y direction (front):

    OMTech 60W beam alignment - head Y plane
    OMTech 60W beam alignment – head Y plane

    The tilt does not seen to correct for a misalignment in the X axis rail or the brackets attaching the head to the linear bearing.

    The beam seems properly centered on the lens and nozzle, so I’m loath to twiddle the alignment just to see what happens. One of these days, for sure, that must happen …

  • OMTech 60 W Laser: Improved MDF Spikes and Stops

    OMTech 60 W Laser: Improved MDF Spikes and Stops

    A bit of tinkering suggested I needed a way to repeatably position stock sheets on the honeycomb, so I conjured stops that would be slightly taller than the magnetic spikes:

    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes - first pass
    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes – first pass

    Three of those form a corner into which you can tuck victims of the same general size:

    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes - stock alignment
    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes – stock alignment

    Those pointy MDF spikes should start with slightly rounded tops, because that’s what they’ll look like after a few uses:

    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes - alignment stops
    Improved MDF Honeycomb Spikes – alignment stops

    I also made a low-profile stop for victims lying directly on the honeycomb for engraving:

    Please Close The Gate - engraved
    Please Close The Gate – engraved

    The SVG images include a nested version to tile across random MDF leftovers.

    The SVG images as a GitHub Gist:

    Loading
    Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
    Sorry, we cannot display this file.
    Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
    Loading
    Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
    Sorry, we cannot display this file.
    Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

  • OMTech 60 W Laser: Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes

    OMTech 60 W Laser: Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes

    When a cardboard base plate under metal spikes would pose a fire hazard, you can position magnetic spikes where they’re needed:

    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes - acrylic
    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes – acrylic

    The 12 mm neodymium magnet is slightly larger than a single honeycomb cell, so it wants to center itself atop a cell. The stainless steel button head screw sits in the magnet’s countersunk hole and protrudes just enough to make sure the spike doesn’t slide sideways unless you want it to:

    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes - parts detail
    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes – parts detail

    A cloud of combustible gas doesn’t pose a threat under there:

    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes - MDF
    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes – MDF

    The thin red beam comes from the targeting laser on the back of the nozzle.

    Storage is easy: just smush a handful of the things against the side of the laser cabinet:

    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes - storage
    Magnetic Honeycomb Spikes – storage

    Buy all the parts in lots of 100 to have supplies for other adventures!

  • Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Oscilloscope Comparison

    Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Oscilloscope Comparison

    The little DSO-150 oscilloscope has a 1 MΩ || 20 pF input with a 200 kHz bandwidth that should be entirely adequate for the OMTech laser’s millisecond-scale modulation signals from the Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter. There is, however, only one way to be sure:

    Gentec ED-200 - scope test setup
    Gentec ED-200 – scope test setup

    The two scope inputs are in parallel, so the joulemeter over on the far right sees a 500 kΩ load, half of the specified 1 MΩ load, with at least twice the capacitance. If the two scopes display pretty much the same result, then it’s good enough.

    A 50 ms pulse at half power looks the same on both scopes:

    • Gentec ED-200 - 50 ms - DSO-150
    • Gentec ED-200 - 50 ms - Siglent

    A 50 ms pulse at full power doesn’t quite top out:

    • Gentec ED-200 - 11V 50ms - DSO-150
    • Gentec ED-200 - 11V 50ms - Siglent

    Given that the pulse duration should be less than the detector’s 1.5 ms risetime, using a 50 ms pulse is absurd. Right now I’m just looking at the overall waveform and detector range, not trying to get useful numbers out of the poor thing.

    All in all, the DSO-150 will do just fine.

  • OMTech 60 W Laser vs. Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Long Pulse Duration Power

    OMTech 60 W Laser vs. Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Long Pulse Duration Power

    The Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter is severely underqualified to measure the OMTech 60 W laser’s beam power, because the laser’s 1 ms minimum manual pulse width isn’t much shorter than the sensor’s 1.5 ms risetime and the maximum beam power is far too high for the sensor’s health. With that in mind, I set the PWM power to 50% = 30 W (grossly too high) and looked at the peak output voltage for a series of (far too long) pulse widths:

    Rounding the detector sensitivity to 11 V/J says the 1.3 V peak at 5 ms corresponds to 120 mJ and 24 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 5ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 5ms

    The 3.3 V peak at 10 ms is 300 mJ and 30 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 10ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 10ms

    The 3.4 V peak at 15 ms is 310 mJ and 21 W suggests the PWM power output is not nearly as constant as one might expect, although the pulse width looks fine:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 15ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 15ms

    The 6 V peak at 20 ms is 550 mJ and 27 W, although the on-screen display obscures the top:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 20ms OSD
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms OSD

    Another 20 ms pulse without the OSD produces a peak eyballometrically close to 6.4 V for 580 mJ and 29 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 20ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms

    The KT332N controller in the OMTech 60 W laser has a pulse duration setting showing tenths of a millisecond, but (based on some additional measurements) the beam power can vary by 25% for successive pulses in the low millisecond range, so the pulse width resolution doesn’t seem to provide useful control.

    Despite the over-long pulses, the calculated power corresponds surprisingly well with the nominal laser output power.

    The 1 ms pulses used in LightBurn’s Dot Mode are consistent enough to punch essentially identical 0.2(-ish) mm holes in manila paper to mark the graticule:

    OMTech 60W laser - beam alignment - focus detail - 2022-03-22
    OMTech 60W laser – beam alignment – focus detail – 2022-03-22

    They’re on 0.25 mm centers, with slight variations showing the difference between stepper resolution and positioning accuracy. The shorter graticule lines have three holes on one side of the center lines and four on the other, despite the design’s 1 mm length on both sides; I think there’s a missing dot on the side where the head starts the line, perhaps due to a picket-fence error.

    The large beam hole came from two 10 ms pulses, one at the focal point and another 10 mm lower.

  • MTD Snowthrower Friction Drive Rebuild

    MTD Snowthrower Friction Drive Rebuild

    During the last snowstorm of the season, the venerable MTD snowthrower carved a trench out of the garage and across the driveway, then abruptly stopped moving. The motor roared and the auger turned, but the drive clutch handle had no effect, so I dragged its carcass into the garage and we completed the mission by hand.

    Popping the belly plate on the next sunny day revealed the problem: the jam nut (part 34) anchoring the Friction Disk Wheel (part 28) to the Friction Wheel Bracket Assembly (part 32) had gone missing:

    MTD Snowblower - page 26 - friction drive parts
    MTD Snowblower – page 26 – friction drive parts

    Worse, the Wheel’s threaded shaft spent some time rattling around in the Bracket while chewing up its thread:

    MTD Snowthrower - friction disk wheel - damaged thread
    MTD Snowthrower – friction disk wheel – damaged thread

    This would ordinarily be No Big Deal, but what you see of the shaft is all you get: it rotates freely in the bearing embedded in the Wheel with no way to hold it while cleaning up its threads.

    Having already promised to replace the Wheel, I installed the new Wheel using a castle nut secured with a generous dollop of red Loctite, then tapped two of its castellations into the shaft’s slot as a mechanical anchor:

    MTD Snowthrower - friction disk wheel - castle nut
    MTD Snowthrower – friction disk wheel – castle nut

    I really wanted to lay a nice hard roll pin along that slot through the nut, but there’s no convincing way to secure such a thing without a second nut. Maybe next time?

    While I had the drive train apart, the sad state of the Wheel Shift Rod Assembly (part 29) became apparent:

    MTD Snowthrower - wheel shift rod - worn
    MTD Snowthrower – wheel shift rod – worn

    I scuffed up the shiny wear mark, turned a suitable acetal bushing, filled the trench with epoxy, and squished the bushing in place:

    MTD Snowthrower - wheel shift rod - acetal bushing
    MTD Snowthrower – wheel shift rod – acetal bushing

    The flange might hold it in place against the Frame Shift Bracket (part 18), which snugly contains the rest of the bushing against the epoxy, so the whole affair might outlast the next season’s first snowstorm. We shall see.

    A nice new R-clip secures the Friction Wheel Bracket Assembly in place against the old washer:

    MTD Snowthrower - friction bracket R-pin
    MTD Snowthrower – friction bracket R-pin

    You might want to insert it the other way, but the black plastic housing above it extends just far enough to thwart your (well, my) desire.