Debossed Printed Legends

[Update: It seems I interchanged “em” and “de” throughout this post.  ]

Up to this point, I’ve been labeling printed parts with emdebossed legends that look OK on the solid model:

Astable Multivibrator Battery Holder

Astable Multivibrator Battery Holder

Alas, the recessed letters become lost in their perimeter threads:

3D Printed Legend - Embossed

3D Printed Legend – Embossed

Raising the legend above the surface (“deembossing”) works reasonably well, but raised letters would interfere with sliding the battery into the holder and tend to get lost amid the surface infill pattern.

The blindingly obvious solution, after far too long, raises the letters above a frame embossed into the surface:

Astable Multivibrator Battery Holder - Legend Debossed

Astable Multivibrator Battery Holder – Legend Debossed

Which looks OK in the real world, too:

3D Printed Legend - Debossed

3D Printed Legend – Debossed

The frame is one thread deep and the legend is one thread tall, putting the letters flush with the surrounding surface and allowing the battery to slide smoothly.

The legend on the bottom surface shows even more improvement:

NP-BX1 battery holder - Raised vs Recessed Legend

NP-BX1 battery holder – Raised vs Recessed Legend

An OpenSCAD program can’t get the size of a rendered text string, so the fixed-size frame must surround the largest possible text, which isn’t much of a problem for my simple needs.

, ,

  1. #1 by Keith Neufeld on 2019-01-14 - 11:57

    The Internet seems to think that what you’re doing now is embossing and what you were doing before is debossing. :-)

    • #2 by Ed on 2019-01-14 - 20:03

      Either way, someone is wrong on the Internet!

      Apparently, after careful consideration and research, I completely screwed up.

      Thanks for the nudge …

  1. Vacuum Tube LEDs: Radome Prototype | The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning