Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.
The first two charges for those Baofeng BL-5 batteries show that the actual capacity isn’t quite up to the 1800 mA·h spec:
Baofeng BL-5 Packs – First two charges
The (meager) instructions say that the batteries will reach “full capacity” after three charges. Unless there’s a miracle waiting in the wings for that third charge, I very much doubt that they’ll get any better than the 1400 to 1500 mA·h you see in that graph. Note that the two batteries have quite different capacities and that the capacity for Pack B decreased on the second charge (purple vs. green trace).
Compare that with the Wouxun batteries (plotted with Gnuplot, rather than a screen grab):
Wouxun 7.4 V Packs
Those are all at 250 mA, which is certainly less than the peak current and probably more than the average current. It’s close enough for now, anyway, and shows that the Wouxun batteries actually live up to their spec.
Huh. Who’d’a thunk it?
It looks like the blinky lights should go into power-save mode under 7 V, because there just isn’t that much capacity left when the cells start rolling over the edge of the cliff.
Although the M2’s heated build platform works well enough, somebody who knows what he’s doing (you know who you are: thanks!) sent me an improved version. It’s a PCB heater, laid out to compensate for the usual edge cooling, firmly attached to a tempered glass plate with genuine 3M thermally conductive tape:
Improved M2 HBP – test setup
They designed the heater around the 30 VDC power supply used in their other equipment. Although I had high moderate hopes that a boost power supply would convert the 24 V supply I already had for the stepper driver bricks into the 30 V for the heater, it was not to be. So there’s a 36 V 9.7 A 350 W supply arcing around the planet that (I think) should work better: adjust the voltage down as far as it’ll go, soak up another few volts in the solid-state relay, and Things Should Be Close Enough to 30 V. One can buy a genuine 30 V supply, but it costs surprisingly more than either 24 V or 36 V supplies on the surplus / eBay market and won’t really provide the proper voltage without upward tweaking anyway.
I replaced their standard 0.156 inch square terminals with Anderson Powerpoles, soldered a length of shielded cable to the 100 kΩ thermistor pads, and gimmicked up a connection to the 24 V supply; it delivered 23.7 V at the PCB terminals. The thermistor is 100 kΩ at 25 °C and 11.4 kΩ at 77 °C. The PCB heater is 5.9 Ω at 25 °C and 7.3 Ω at 77 °C; it dissipates 77 W at 77 °C (no, that’s not a typo).
The ultimate temperature looks to be about 90 °C with a 24 V supply, which isn’t quite enough for ABS (which I’m not using in the M2 right now, but probably will eventually). The time constant, assuming the 1-e-1 point is 66 °C, works out to about 9 minutes; it’ll be up to final temperature in half an hour. Those numbers aren’t quite as accurate as one might wish, because the heater power drops as the temperature rises and the copper resistance increases.
A 30 V supply would dissipate 120 W at 77 °C and rumor has it that the ultimate temperature is around 125 °C, which would be fine for ABS. Goosing the power a bit would produce more heat, but I’v been running the Thing-O-Matic at 110 °C and that’s good enough. More power, of course, gets it to the temperature setpoint faster, which is probably a Very Good Thing.
Obviously, you need PWM to control the temperature; given a 9 minute time constant, a bang-bang controller will work perfectly well.
The original data, including the thermistor resistance after I got my act together, plus a cute little temperature-vs-time graph:
Improved M2 HBP – 24 V supply
The colored flyspecks are part of the paper; I salvaged a stack of fancy menu cards from a trash can and padded them up as geek scratch paper.
After I mentioned I was thinking of repurposing the nearly unused lithium-ion batteries from the Wouxun KG-UV3D radios for a blinky light, Dragorn of Kismet introduced me to his Baofeng UV-5 radio. The radio itself seems to be the worst amateur radio you’d be willing to use, but when seen as a standardized battery and drop-in charger with a free radio and antenna tossed into the deal, it’s not all that bad:
Baofeng UV-5RE radio – overview
The Wouxun and Baofeng 7.4 V batteries allegedly have similar capacities: 1700 vs 1800 mA·h. The Baofeng also has a 3800 (or 3600) mA·h pack that extends well below the base of the radio (not all large packs seem to be compatible with the UV-5RE radios I got); that would be roughly equivalent to the larger packs that power the Wouxun / APRS / voice gadgetry on the bike.
The Baofeng battery pack is smaller and has features that seem less likely to misbehave on a bike.
It has a latching tab with a ramp and a positive notch, with ridges around the edge that engage the radio shell:
Baofeng UV-5RE radio – battery latch tab
The radio body (which is what I must duplicate) has a movable latch tab above the battery contact pins, so the latch holds the battery into the compartment. The spring-loaded pin pairs are wired in parallel, presumably for redundant contact with each battery terminal:
Baofeng UV-5RE radio – battery compartment latch and contacts
The battery terminal pads are reasonably well protected by the tab:
Baofeng UV-5RE radio – battery contact pads
The battery slides into the radio compartment and latches with a snap. Two holes on the battery base engage a pair of pegs on the radio case:
Baofeng UV-5RE radio – battery base detail
The holes are rounded rectangles and the pegs have one corner sliced off. The pegs seem entirely too fragile and not well suited for 3D printing, so some metalwork may be in order. The pegs must resist only pulling forces perpendicular to the case back, not sliding forces, and the case constrains side-to-side motion.
The two square posts (with two others not shown) form the “feet” that support the radio when it’s standing on the desk or in the charger.
Now, to doodle up the dimensions and measure the actual capacity.
Speaking of capacity, BL-5 batteries on eBay range from $23 for “genuine Baofeng” that may or may not actually have that name on the label, all the way down to $8 for the usual no-name equivalent.
For reasons that will become apparent in a while, I got a pair (*) of boost power supplies from the usual eBay source, allegedly capable of boosting a 10-to-32 VDC input to a 12-to-35 VDC output, up to 10 A and 150 W:
Boost power supply
After establishing that it would not produce 30 V into a 5.9 Ω load (5.1 A, but 152 W), I got systematic.
A 100 Ω resistor drew 1/4 A while I set the output to 28 V. Doubling up the resistors showed that it worked OK at half an amp:
Boost supply – 50 ohm load
Four 6 Ω resistors in series draw 1.2 A, then (channeling the true spirit of DIY 3D printing) two in series drew 2.3 A:
Boost supply – 12 ohm load
That’s 32 W each and, yes, they did get toasty, but, no, I didn’t leave them turned on all that long.
But a 6 Ω resistance still didn’t work, so the supply can’t provide 4.7 A at 130 W. In case you were wondering, that’s two 6 Ω resistors in series and a pair of those strings in parallel, so each resistor still sees 32 W.
In terms of driving the actual load, these supplies aren’t going to light it up.
Ah, well, whaddaya want for five buck from halfway around the planet?
(*) Davy’s Aphorism: Never buy only one of any surplus item, because you’ll never find another. Get at least two, maybe three if it’s something you might actually use.
Although I’d prefer open commenting, that just isn’t practical: spambots manage to create WordPress.com user accounts and post about 300 spams per day, of which I see perhaps a dozen false positives. Asking you to either sign in or provide some details helps slow the torrent.
Another inept spammer recently posted Yet Another un-expanded comment template, but the bungled script added some interesting information to the bottom. Here’s the last few lines from several pages of raw comment gibberish, with the URLs snipped out to protect the innocent:
A month ago I tossed a new bag of silica gel into the basement safe and put the used one on the workbench to see how much more water it would adsorb. The numbers worked out like this:
Bag + staples: about 8 g
Dry weight: 500 g of silica gel beads
At 24%RH: 575 g = +67 g water
At basement ambient, about 50%RH: 652 g = +144 g water
At upstairs ambient, about 65%RH: 673 g = +165 g water
At 50%RH, the capacity is about 27% = 135 g of water, which is close to the measured 144 g. The logger recording groundwater temperature says the average humidity hovers just under 55%RH, in which case 28% capacity = 140 g of water: as close as you could possibly hope for.
At 65%RH, the capacity is about 32% = 160 g of water, which is very close to the measured 165 g.
The safe humidity remains flatlined at the logger’s 15%RH minimum level, with one blip when I installed the door gasket strips:
Basement_Safe – 2013-08-28
After I accumulate a few more used bags, we’ll see how well they regenerate.
A giant envelope containing one of those “political surveys” that’s actually a thinly disguised fundraiser arrived, with this confidence-inspiring ID in the upper-right corner: