For an upcoming Circuit Cellar column on Hall effect current sensing, I slit another pair of toroids:

Then wound them with grossly excessive amounts of wire (the up-armored core on the right appeared earlier):

The smaller toroid is an FT37-43 that barely covers the active area of an SS49-style Hall effect sensor, but experience with the FT50 toroid suggests that’ll be entirely enough:

Data on the uncut toroids:
Property | FT50-61 | FT37-43 |
---|---|---|
Outer diameter (OD) – inch | 0.50 | 0.375 |
Inner diameter (ID) – inch | 0.281 | 0.187 |
Length – inch | 0.188 | 0.125 |
Cross section area – cm2 | 0.133 | 0.133 |
Mean path length (MPL) – cm | 3.02 | 2.15 |
Volume – cm3 | 0.401 | 0.163 |
Relative Permeability (μr ) | 125 | 850 |
Saturation flux G @ 10 Oe | 2350 | 2750 |
Inductance factor (AL) – nH/turn2 | 68.0 | 420 |
Those overstuffed windings improved the sensitivity, but increased the winding resistance far beyond what’s reasonable.
Data on the slit toroids:
Toroid ID | FT50-61 | FT37-43 | FT50-61 |
---|---|---|---|
Measured air gap – cm | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
Winding data | |||
Turns | 120 | 80 | 25 |
Wire gauge – AWG | 28 | 32 | 26 |
Winding resistance – mΩ | 530 | 920 | 100 |
Predicted B field – G/A | 872 | 660 | 163 |
Hall effect sensor @ 1.9 mV/G | |||
Predicted output – mV/mA | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.31 |
Actual output – mV/mA | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.37 |
Actual/predicted ratio – % | +12 | +46 | +19 |
The last few lines in that table show the transimpedance (transresistance, really, but …) based on the winding current to Hall sensor output voltage ratio (in either mV/mA or V/A, both dimensionally equivalent to ohms), which is why the toroid’s internal magnetic flux doesn’t matter as long as it’s well below saturation.
Gnawing the 80 turn winding off the FT37-43 toroid and rewinding it with 15 turns of 24 AWG wire dropped the winding resistance to 23 mΩ and the transimpedance to 0.36 mV/mA:

However, applying a voltage gain of about 28 (after removing the sensor’s VCC/2 bias) will produce a 0-to-5 V output from 500 mA input, which seems reasonable.
One thought on “Air-gapped Ferrite Toroid Data”
Comments are closed.