Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.
Category: Software
General-purpose computers doing something specific
Which worked reasonably well for coasters with a rim around the perimeter to hold in the epoxy covering the entire top surface:
Printed Coaster Layout – solid model
The problem with smooth-top coasters is this:
Printed Coasters – epoxy fill
A slightly sweaty or wet mug can get a firm suction lock on that smooth top, lift the coaster off the table, then drop it into a plate of food.
So I put a rim around each fragment to separate the epoxy surfaces and break the suction lock:
Printed Coaster Layout – 5 inch Set B
Each recess has a narrow inner lip as a border inside the raised perimeter, which may not be strictly necessary, but IMO nicely sets off the fragments:
Smashed Glass 3D Printed Coaster – Set B
Each fragment must be spaced far enough from its three neighbors to allow for those lips and perimeter walls, which requires more fussing than I’m willing to apply on a regular basis.
So fetch & install Deepnest to fuss automagically. The program hasn’t been updated in years and the Linux version segfaults on my Manjaro boxen, but the Windows version runs fine on the Mini-PC I use for LightBurn:
Deepnest Fragment Set E – in progress
The Mini-PC runs maxi-hot, though, so at some point I must install Deepnest on the Token Windows Laptop for more grunt.
Deepnest requires a large shape representing the “sheet” in which to arrange the other pieces, so:
Import the fragments outlines into LightBurn
Create a suitable circle
Export circle + fragments as an SVG file
Import into Deepnest
Set 5 mm spacing & other suitable parameters
Let it grind until a nice arrangement pops out
Save as Yet Another SVG file
The output SVG has the fragment outlines arranged to fit within the circle, but does not include the circle. That’s fine, because the next step involves creating a conformal perimeter around the entire group of fragments and preparing it for input to OpenSCAD to create a solid model:
Printed Coaster Layout – 5 inch Set C – solid model
Cleaning the baseboard radiator fins before moving the houseplants back to their winter abode by the living room window made sense, so I took the trim covers off and vacuumed a remarkable accumulation of fuzz off the top and out from between the fins. The covers had an equally remarkable accumulation of sawdust along their bottom edge, apparently deposited when the previous owners had the floor sanded before they moved in a decade ago.
If you happen to live in a house with baseboard radiators, I’m guessing you never looked inside, because nobody (else) does.
Anyhow, the radiator fins should rest on plastic carriers atop the bent-metal struts also supporting the trim covers, so that they slide noiselessly when the copper pipe expands & contracts during the heating cycle. Over the last six decades, however, the plastic deteriorated and most of the carriers were either missing or broken to the point of uselessness:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – old vs new
The shapes on the bottom are replacements made with a 3D printed base (“sled”) and a chipboard wrap around the radiator preventing the fins from contacting the strut:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – OpenSCAD show
Although it was tempting to 3D print the whole thing, because plastic, I figured there was little point in finesse: chipboard would work just as well, was much faster to produce, and I need not orient the shapes to keep the printed threads in the right direction.
The Prusa MK4 platform was just big enough for the number of sleds I needed:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – printed
The sleds along the left and right edges lost traction as the printing progressed, but everything came out all right.
The OpenSCAD program also produces 2D SVG shapes for the chipboard wraps and adhesive rectangles sticking them to the sleds:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – OpenSCAD SVGs
Import those into LightBurn, duplicate using the Grid Array, Fire The Laser, then assemble:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – assembly
The slits encourage the chipboard to bend in the right direction at the right place, so I didn’t need any fancy tooling to get a decent result.
A few rather unpleasant hours crawling around on the floor got the struts bent back into shape and the sleds installed under the fins:
Baseboard Radiator Sled – installed
Protip: Gloves aren’t just a good idea, they’re essential.
The trim cover presses the angled chipboard where it should go against the fins. The covers carry shadows of the plastic carriers, suggesting the clearance was tighter than it should have been and thermal cycling put more stress on the plastic than expected. We’ll never know.
Although I’ll make more for the other baseboards as the occasion arises, I hope to never see these again …
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The first step in adding a filter bag to the dryer vent requires a convenient way to attach it. Because we live in the future, a couple of hours of 3D printing produced something that might work:
Clothes Dryer Vent Filter Snout – installed
It’s made of TPU, which is bendy enough to ease two tabs into the two outermost slots you can see and a corresponding pair of tabs into slots on the wall side.
The solid model shows the part snapped inside the vent:
Clothes Dryer Vent Filter Snout – OpenSCAD show
The flared bottom takes something like three hours to print (TPU likes slooow extrusion), so I did the top ring first to verify the tab fit:
Clothes Dryer Vent Filter Snout – OpenSCAD build
Both parts come from hull() surfaces wrapped around quartets of thin circles at the proper positions; the difference() of two slightly different hulls produces thin shells.
A thin layer of JB PlasticBonder urethane adhesive, which bonds TPU like glue, holds the two parts together. I used the tan variant and, while it’s not a perfect match, it definitely looks better than black. Not that it matters in this case.
Mary will sew up a bag with a drawstring holding it to the snout. If everything survives the performance tests, printing the whole snout in one four-hour job will both make sense and eliminate an uneven joint that’s sure to be a lint-catcher.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
My Fitbit Charge 5 has become fussy about its exact position while snapped to its magnetic charger, so I thought elevating it above the usual clutter might improve its disposition:
FitBit Charge 5 stand – installed
The Charge 5 now snaps firmly onto its charger, the two power pins make solid contact, and it charges just like it used to.
The Terracycle (now T-cycle, for reasons presumably involving the transfer of money) chain return idlers on our Tour Easy bikes developed hardening of their urethane tires:
Terracycle Idler tire – printed vs OEM
Urethane shouldn’t crack like that, but after more than fifteen years, stuff wears out.
The white ring is 95A TPU printed on the Makergear M2, which is definitely more flexy than the original tire, but has the redeeming feature of being both Good Enough and trivially easy to model:
include <BOSL2/std.scad>
NumSides = 4*3*2*4;
$fn=NumSides;
Thick = 3.5;
ID = 46.4;
OD = ID + 2*Thick;
Length = 11.2;
tube(Length,id=ID,od=OD,anchor=BOTTOM);
It printed with 5 mm brims on both the ID and OD, because TPU has the barest adhesion to the M2’s glass plate + hair glue. There’s a long-unopened box now on the bench with a BuildTak PEI surface (thank you: you know who you are!) that should improve the situation.
In any event, the tires fit well:
Terracycle Idler tire – installed
The layer-to-layer adhesion isn’t as good as I think it should be, so I’ll likely use those tires as testcases for tweaking the new build plate & settings.
The motivation for making Yet Another Coaster was to see if combining a few techniques I’ve recently learned would produce a nicer result.
Spoiler: Yup, with more to be learned and practiced.
This is a somewhat nonlinear narrative reminding me of things to do and not do in the future, so don’t treat it as a direct how-to set of instructions.
The glass fragments sit inside holes in the next two (or three or whatever) acrylic layers, which must have a total thicknesses slightly more than the glass thickness andremain properly aligned while assembling the whole stack:
Smashed Glass Coaster 5 – alignment pin
Bonus: all that cutting generates an absurd amount of acrylic scrap. I eventually put much of it to good use, but not producing it in the first place would be a Good Thing …
So 3D print the entire base, which requires generating a solid model with recesses for the fragments:
Printed Coaster Layout – solid model
Because there’s no real justification for an optical-quality mirror under smashed glass, use reflective metallized paper in the recesses as reflectors:
Smashed glass printed coaster – metallized paper assembly
The glass is more-or-less greenish-blueish, so I used a strip of green metallized paper that made the glass fragments green. Obviously there’s some room for choice down there.
Both the base and the reflectors use outlines of the fragments, so I started with a scan of the approximate layout in GIMP:
Smashed Glass – 4in – group A – tweaked
I traced the outline of each fragment using the Scissors Select Tool, which lays line segments along the sharpest gradient between clicked points, then switched into Quick Mask mode to adjust & smooth the results:
Smashed Glass paths – quick mask
That’s the result after sketching & saving all the paths as separate SVG files to allow importing them individually into InkScape, OpenSCAD, and LightBurn.
Which turned out to be suboptimal, as it let me write an off-by-one blooper omitting the last file from the OpenSCAD model:
A better choice puts all the paths into a single named group, saved as a single SVG file, then importing that group from the file using its name, along these lines:
It’s not clear if I can do that directly from GIMP by saving all the paths in a single file, then importing that lump into Inkscape as a group, but it’ll go something like that.
After getting the fragment paths into Inkscape, add a 0.5 mm offset to each path to clear any non-vertical edges. This will be checked with the template cut using LightBurn as described below.
Add a 1 mm rim around the outside, with the 4 inch OD matching the usual PSA cork base:
Fragment layout – 4in
Now’s the time to nudge / rotate the outlines so they have at least a millimeter of clearance on all sides / ends, because that’s about as thin a section of printed plastic as you want.
Locating the center of the OD (and, thus, everything inside) at the lower-left corner of the Inkscape page will put them at the OpenSCAD origin. I have set Inkscape to have its origin at the lower left, rather than the default upper left, so your origin may vary.
Select one of the paths:
Fragment layout – Inkscape A
Then set the ID in its Object Properties:
Fragment layout – Inkscape A – properties
There is an interaction between the name over in the Layers and Objects window, which apparently comes from the GIMP path name for the imported fragments, and the resulting ID and Label in the Object Properties window. However, renaming an object on the left, as for the Rim and Perimeter circles, does not set their ID or Label on the right. Obviously, I have more learning to do before this goes smoothly.
With everything laid out and named and saved in an SVG file, the OpenSCAD program is straightforward (and now imports all the fragments):
Which squirts out the solid model appearing above.
Feeding it into PrusaSlicer turns the model into something printable:
Printed Coaster Layout – slicer
And after supper I had one in my hands.
Before doing that, however, import the same SVG file into LightBurn, as on the left:
Printed Coaster Layout – LightBurn
On the right, duplicate it, put the inner Rim on a tool layer, put the rest on a layer set to cut chipboard, and make a template to verify those holes fit around the fragments:
Smashed glass printed coaster – fragment test fit
Which a few didn’t, explaining why I go to all that trouble. Iterate through GIMP → paths → SVG → Inkscape → LightBurn until it’s all good. Obviously, you do this before you get too far into OpenSCAD, but they all derive from the Inkscape layout, so there’s not a lot of wasted motion.
The middle LightBurn layout insets the fragment outlines by 0.25 mm to ensure the paper fits easily and puts them on a layer set to cut metallized paper. Those fragments then get duplicated and rearranged within the rectangle on the top to fit a strip of metallized paper from the scrap box. Fire The Laser to cut them out and stick them to the bottom of their corresponding 3D printed recesses with leftover snippets of craft adhesive sheet as shown above.
I had originally intended to cover the bottom of the entire sheet of metallized paper with an adhesive sheet, but realized the whole affair was going to be submerged in epoxy, so just making sure the paper didn’t float away would suffice.