Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.
It’s now oriented with the back side of the lens toward the unfocused beam going into the laser head.
The front surface remains undamaged after two pulses at 500 ms 50% power:
Laser vs sunglasses – beam rear – front overview
The red disk in the middle of both wounds is new this time.
As seen from the rear, the first pulse shattered the rear glass layer:
Laser vs sunglasses – beam rear – A
The image is about 7 mm from side to side.
A chip of glass popped out of the upper part of the fracture, but the other pieces remained in place.
The distinct blue ring is 3 mm OD and marks the inner boundary of a purple disk surrounding the central burn. The disk appears only in reflected light (which is impossible to photograph with any setup I can manage), suggesting it comes from diffraction in a surprisingly uniform air layer blown between the glass and the plastic polarizing sheet.
Also seen from the rear, the second pulse produced a neater wound:
Laser vs sunglasses – beam rear – B
The blue ring is again 3 mm OD and the image is 7 mm across.
The central red spot probably comes from damage to the polarizing sheet.
The most surprising things, at least to me, didn’t happen:
the glass lens didn’t disintegrate
the laser beam didn’t punch completely through
Protip: Don’t depend on ordinary glasses, even fancy sunglasses, to protect your eyes from CO₂ laser beams.
Well, a shattered lens found beside the road on a walk:
Laser vs sunglasses – focused overview
The battered frame has enough information to suggest they were once rather fancy. At this point, all that matters is they have two glass layers separated by a dark plastic polarizing film, with a gold-ish metallized front glass surface.
I fired the two pulses (on the left side of the obvious crack) at the front of the lens, both at 100 ms / 70% power:
Laser vs sunglasses – overview
Neither pulse penetrated the lens.
The smaller zit was fired in the position shown in the first picture, with the focal point more-or-less at the top surface of the lens. As seen from the front:
Laser vs sunglasses – focused front
The outer part of the damaged area is about 0.5 mm in diameter. The heat around the damage seems to have cleared away all the schmutz on the lens; those things that look like scratches are oily smears and road dirt.
Seen from the rear:
Laser vs sunglasses – focused rear
The rear surface is blistered, but doesn’t have a hole, so I think the beam melted the glass and inflated a cavity along its path.
I then perched the lens in the unfocused beam path, with paper taped over the laser head opening to keep any fragments off the mirror and focus lens:
Laser vs sunglasses – beam front overview
The beam produced the larger scar and also blasted off a ring of crud around the wound, as seen from the front surface:
Laser vs sunglasses – beam front
The beam seems to have shattered a thin layer under the metallization, but didn’t do any deeper damage. The rear surface is undamaged and the paper didn’t have a scorch mark.
They’re not laser safety glasses, but at least they didn’t disintegrate.
Protip: do not lie on the laser platform and stare upward into the laser head, even while wearing fancy polarized mirrorshades.
This conversation started during the few hours when I had to turn off my phone’s incoming-call whitelist filter:
Cash Home Sale SMS
Seems to me a cash-for-house buyer who believes anything the seller says about the property is both new to the “real estate” biz and not destined for a long career. Obviously, the whole exchange attempts to increase my engagement and make me agree with everything going on.
Now, should you happen to be moving to the Mid-Hudson Valley and need a really nice shop with an attached house, let me know: we can work out a better deal.
Protip: if you’re in a position to stack seven thousand Benjamins on our kitchen table, don’t get between us and and the horizon.
There is a reason all my calls and texts go through a whitelist filter.
For reasons not relevant here, a new medication has entered the house, accompanied by its Drug Fact Sheet (blurred because you do not have a Need To Know):
Drug Fact Sheet
The background squares are a scant one foot across.
The other side of the sheet is equally dense.
One should review this with each refill to check for new or changed information. Of course, there are no change bars or similar hints.
It might kill ya or cure ya, but you’ll never figure it out from that torrent of verbiage: just like software EULAs, nobody can possibly read and comprehend that stuff.
For the record, it is possible to get a piece of paper jammed so far inside the duplexer rollers in the back of an Epson ET-3830 Multifunction Printer / Scanner that it is not only completely invisible from the inside, but that it cannot be removed without disassembling the duplexer:
Epson ET-3830 duplexer jam
It jammed while attempting to print another batch of Geek Scratch Paper with a semilog grid, without actually duplexing the sheets. The specs say the printer can handle 4×6 paper, so I assumed 4.24×5.5 paper would be Close Enough. Apparently not.
Print ’em two-up, chop the sheets down the middle, pad and glue, and it’s all good:
OMTech CO2 laser power supply – bandwidth tests – semilog graph