Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.
Category: Science
If you measure something often enough, it becomes science
A rare trip to the Poughkeepsie Railroad Station provided an opportunity to check out the LED bulbs in the chandeliers:
The 108 bulbs had only one deader (lower left in chandelier C).
I have no way of knowing if they’re the same bulbs from six years ago, but the accumulation of bugs / dust / crud inside the (what I would expect to be) sealed envelopes suggests they’ve been hanging there for quite a while:
Pok RR Station – Chandelier B – detail
The dark cruciform patches might come from failed LED chip strings, although the bulbs all had the same eyeballometric brightness. The patches all seem to have a hard lower edge, so we may be seeing shadows from dust accumulating atop the chips on the PCB.
It seems white-tinted polyethylene deteriorates after a dozen years of exposure to concentrated MEK fumes, suggesting I don’t use nearly enough enamel paint.
The Container Stockpile disgorged a pair of pure polyethylene jars that should last another decade.
We deployed six sticky traps in the onion patch immediately after planting in late April and replaced the cards in mid-June. The first set of cards collected a considerable number of what resemble, to my untrained eye, onion maggot flies and the onion plants remain healthy:
Each image shows both sides of a single card.
The cards sit a foot above the shredded leaf mulch and I managed to drop at least one of the cards while extracting it from the cage, but they all have plenty of onion maggot flies in addition to the random debris.
The cards inside their cages have not accumulated larger insects like honeybees / moths / butterflies, although the tiniest specks are definitely mini-critters along the beetle / gnat / aphid / mosquito axis.
Unlike last year, the second set of cards will remain in place until harvest to maintain continuous pressure on the fly population.
If you’re really interested, the dozen original camera images have more detail.
I thought a pine plank would cut faster than oak, but they’re equally stubborn.
Maple requires slightly more power, with the glued butt joints between the slabs putting up a stiff resistance.
A sheet of 3 mm MDF cuts well at 20 mm/s 60% and I expect 3 mm plywood might need similar numbers.
A pervasive odor of burned wood seems to be the only downside; if you think a wood stove is a good idea, you’ll love laser cutting the stuff. Sanding the blackened perimeter and sealing the surface surely helps, but it’s feasible only for the kind of simple convex shapes you don’t really need a laser to cut.
The little DSO-150 oscilloscope has a 1 MΩ || 20 pF input with a 200 kHz bandwidth that should be entirely adequate for the OMTech laser’s millisecond-scale modulation signals from the Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter. There is, however, only one way to be sure:
Gentec ED-200 – scope test setup
The two scope inputs are in parallel, so the joulemeter over on the far right sees a 500 kΩ load, half of the specified 1 MΩ load, with at least twice the capacitance. If the two scopes display pretty much the same result, then it’s good enough.
A 50 ms pulse at half power looks the same on both scopes:
Gentec ED-200 – 50 ms – DSO-150
Gentec ED-200 – 50 ms – Siglent
A 50 ms pulse at full power doesn’t quite top out:
Gentec ED-200 – 11V 50ms – DSO-150
Gentec ED-200 – 11V 50ms – Siglent
Given that the pulse duration should be less than the detector’s 1.5 ms risetime, using a 50 ms pulse is absurd. Right now I’m just looking at the overall waveform and detector range, not trying to get useful numbers out of the poor thing.
The Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter is severely underqualified to measure the OMTech 60 W laser’s beam power, because the laser’s 1 ms minimum manual pulse width isn’t much shorter than the sensor’s 1.5 ms risetime and the maximum beam power is far too high for the sensor’s health. With that in mind, I set the PWM power to 50% = 30 W (grossly too high) and looked at the peak output voltage for a series of (far too long) pulse widths:
Rounding the detector sensitivity to 11 V/J says the 1.3 V peak at 5 ms corresponds to 120 mJ and 24 W:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 5ms
The 3.3 V peak at 10 ms is 300 mJ and 30 W:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 10ms
The 3.4 V peak at 15 ms is 310 mJ and 21 W suggests the PWM power output is not nearly as constant as one might expect, although the pulse width looks fine:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 15ms
The 6 V peak at 20 ms is 550 mJ and 27 W, although the on-screen display obscures the top:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms OSD
Another 20 ms pulse without the OSD produces a peak eyballometrically close to 6.4 V for 580 mJ and 29 W:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms
The KT332N controller in the OMTech 60 W laser has a pulse duration setting showing tenths of a millisecond, but (based on some additional measurements) the beam power can vary by 25% for successive pulses in the low millisecond range, so the pulse width resolution doesn’t seem to provide useful control.
Despite the over-long pulses, the calculated power corresponds surprisingly well with the nominal laser output power.
The 1 ms pulses used in LightBurn’s Dot Mode are consistent enough to punch essentially identical 0.2(-ish) mm holes in manila paper to mark the graticule:
They’re on 0.25 mm centers, with slight variations showing the difference between stepper resolution and positioning accuracy. The shorter graticule lines have three holes on one side of the center lines and four on the other, despite the design’s 1 mm length on both sides; I think there’s a missing dot on the side where the head starts the line, perhaps due to a picket-fence error.
The large beam hole came from two 10 ms pulses, one at the focal point and another 10 mm lower.
The Max Energy Density spec suggests longer pulses are allowed to deposit more energy, probably because more time gives thermal diffusion an opportunity to spread the heat across the target; at CO₂ laser wavelengths that may not apply.
With the platform lowered as far as it goes, the ED-200 is 130 mm below the laser nozzle where the beam diameter is about 6 mm for an area of 0.3 cm². Ignoring the ideal Gaussian beam profile by smearing 60 W uniformly across the circle gives a power density of 200 W/cm², which means the laser pulse must be less than 0.5 W·s / 200 W = 2.5 ms to stay inside the power density limit.
I sincerely hope Gentec overbuilt and underspecified their detector.
The Voltage Response The result is a voltage pulse that rises quickly with the response time of the device to a level proportional to the laser energy (Figure 2). It then decays exponentially over a longer period of time that is a function of the pyroelectric device and load impedance. Figure 2 also shows that there is a longer recovery time to return to the initial state of the detector. This is a function of thermal phenomena and is not affected by the load impedance as are the rise and decay times. The integrated pulse energy over this period is proportional to the peak voltage.
Pulse Width Versus Rise Time
Usually the applied laser pulse must be shorter than the rise time of the detector for all of its energy to be represented by the peak voltage. Pulse energy received after the detector voltage has peaked will not be fully integrated into that value. For very long pulses, the peak voltage will actually represent peak power rather than pulse energy.
Gentec Energy Detectors, page 2
Figure 2 shows the overall waveform:
Gentec Energy Detectors – Figure 2
Which looks a lot like this 10 ms pulse at 50% duty cycle:
Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 10ms
The pulse was 10 ms long, much longer than the 1.5 ms ED-200 risetime spec, but the overall shape looks right. Dividing the 3.3 V peak by the detector’s 10.78 J/V calibration value (11 J/V works for me) says the pulse delivered 300 mJ = 300 mW·s. Dividing 300 mJ by 10 ms gives 30 W, a beam power astonishingly close to the expected value.
The OMTech laser has a nominal 60 W output, although the tube life drops dramatically with regular use over 70% = 40 W. Power does not scale linearly with the laser tube current displayed on the power supply milliammeter, with the maximum value presumably preset to the tube’s 20 mA limit producing 60 W. The 20 kHz PWM duty-cycle chopping applied by the controller should linearly scale the average power downward from there.
It looks like the ED-200 might deliver reasonable results for millisecond-scale pulses at low PWM duty cycles, but it was obviously intended for much milder lasers.
The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning 