The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning

Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.

Category: Home Ec

Things around the home & hearth

  • Sears Kenmore Electric Dryer: New Rear Seal

    Our ancient Sears Kenmore electric clothes dryer (which is not matched to the never-sufficiently-to-be-damned HE3 washer) started squeaking again. The last time it did that, I tore it apart and determined that the rear seal between the drum and the back panel needed replacing; I ordered the seal, buttoned up the dryer, and, amazingly, the squeak Went Away.

    The box with the new seal arrived a few days later and has been perched atop the dryer for the last few months. Never borrow trouble, sez I.

    Unlike the HE3 washer, tearing the dryer down isn’t a big deal. Two screws secure the lint trap enclosure to the top panel; be careful about not dropping them down the chute.

    Screws holding lint trap to top
    Screws holding lint trap to top

    Then push the top forward and pry it off the clips holding it in place. You do not need to remove what looks like clips holding the top to the back panel; they’re sort of hinges that let you tilt the top back. With any luck, you can let the top hang; I rested it on the nearby laundry sink.

    Door switch
    Door switch

    Two screws hold the entire front door panel in place. Before you remove those, disconnect wires from the door latch switch so you can remove the front panel. The alert reader will note I didn’t do that…

    The drum has two sliding seals that bear on the front and rear panels. There is nothing else holding the drum in place, so when you remove the front panel, the drum falls out. It’s helpful to have an assistant holding the drum in place, perhaps with a hand through the open door, while you jockey the front panel out of the way.

    Drum belt path through tensioner
    Drum belt path through tensioner

    Have your assistant continue to hold the drum while you memorize the path of the drive belt around the tensioner and motor pulleys. This is not obvious: you don’t have to take the tensioner pulley off the shaft to remove or install the belt.

    There are two sets of slots in the dryer base plate that could hold the tensioner. Only one set will work. Pay attention to the situation in your dryer.

    Hint: the drum rotates counterclockwise as you view the front of the dryer. The motor pulls the belt off the drum and the tensioner acts on the slack side of the belt. If you try rotating the drum clockwise, the tensioner and motor make graunching noises that will convince you something has gone terribly wrong. It hasn’t, you’re just turning the drum the wrong way.

    With the drum out, this is what the old seal looked like:

    Worn seal
    Worn seal

    I cut the threads at the seam holding the ends of the old seal together and peeled it off the drum. That reveals the dried adhesive all around the drum.

    Removing old seal
    Removing old seal

    I applied xylene to soften the adhesive, then used a razor knife and a vast quantity of rags to remove the goo. The key is to get enough xylene on the adhesive to get its attention without slobbering solvent all over the drum; it will soften the paint, which is a Bad Thing. Do this in the garage or outdoors to enhance Family Harmony.

    I did a trial fit of the new seal, which showed it’s a snug fit and requires careful alignment. A dozen small clamps held successive parts in place while I got it settled. The trick is to position the center part of the T-shaped seal against the rim of the drum without wrinkles. You probably can’t get it right without a dozen clamps.

    To apply the adhesive, I removed two clamps, eased that section of the seal off the rim, and ran two beads of adhesive: one along the rim where the previous adhesive had been and a smaller bead just below the folded metal edge. That pretty well smeared out as I eased the section back in place.

    Then remove the next clamp, ease that section off the rim, apply adhesive, and iterate all the way around.

    Clamping new seal to drum
    Clamping new seal to drum

    I dug a patched bicycle tube out of the drawer and eased it under the clamps around the drum, then pulled it mildly taut all the way around to apply uniform pressure to the seal. Two larger clamps held the slack ends in place.

    After supper, we declared the adhesive (which looks & smells a lot like plain old contact cement) to be cured. Off came the clamps and tube and, lo and behold, it’s all good.

    Reassembly is in the obvious reverse order. The instructions packed with the seal remind you to ease the loose end of the seal outside the drum where it can ride on the back panel. Make it so.

    While your assistant holds the drum in place, reinstall the tensioner and route the belt around it. The belt in our dryer has two possible positions on the pulley (it has ridges), so I made sure it was tracking in the same position as before.

    Attach the front panel, rotate the drum a few times to be sure everything is in place and tracking correctly, then slam the top, screw it down, and you’re done!

  • Silver-Soldering a Stainless Steel Measuring Cup

    Quite some years ago, the spot weld holding half of the handle to the side of my all-time-favorite 1/3-cup measuring cup broke loose. The minuscule weld nugget suggested that the spot welder got distracted; the weld on other side of the handle is perfectly bonded.

    I tried repairing it with silver solder and a torch, which simply proved that’s not within my skill set. I buffed off most of the residue and applied JB Weld epoxy, which lasted just fine until a few days ago. It’s a low-stress situation, indeed, but I’m not surprised that the epoxy didn’t really bond to a slightly scuffed stainless steel surface.

    So, this time around, I did it right: sandpapered off the epoxy, scuffed up the cup and handle by shoe-shining a sandpaper strip face up and face down in the gap, then silver-soldered the handle in place using my resistance soldering gadget (which I promise to describe some day).

    The setup was straightforward. Clamp the cup in the bench vise with soft copper jaws (hammered from ordinary pipe) that also grip one electrode from the soldering unit.

    Silver-soldered handle - left side
    Silver-soldered handle – left side
    Silver-soldered handle - right side
    Silver-soldered handle – right side

    I used a strip of fancy Brownell’s Silvalloy 355 silver solder ribbon (which is 56% silver instead of the chintzy 4% junk I normally use) with some truly toxic silver solder flux. About ten seconds of heat melted the solder and produced a pair of nice fillets along the sides of the handle.

    The flux washed off in hot water and a few licks with fine sandpaper cleaned things up just fine. The carbon electrode left a bit of schmutz on the handle, but nothing a Dremel brass brush wheel couldn’t solve.

    The inside has a bit of heat discoloration, but the sandpaper knocked that back reasonably well, too.

    Heat discoloration inside cup
    Heat discoloration inside cup

    The final product looked a lot better than these in-work pictures, but it’s tough to photograph subtle differences in a shiny silver object.

    Anyhow, as you might expect, we value function over form in this household.

  • Dry Ice Sublimation Rate

    For reasons I’m not at liberty to discuss, we had a cooler of dry ice pellets in the freezer for a few days. I used about a pound of it a time to mumble.

    I started with “10 pounds” of dry ice in a half-pound Styrofoam container with 1.5-inch thick walls; the total weights include the container. For what it’s worth, dry ice costs $3.50/pound under 10 pounds, then $2.75/pound over that. It used to be plenty cheaper in the old days, evidently, but everything else was, too.

    In between withdrawals, the cooler sat in the freezer and and the dry ice quietly sublimated; here’s how the weight varied between uses.

    Starting weight: 9.2 lb gross, so I lost quite a bit in transit. Which, as it happened, was about half an hour in a bike trailer during a rather hot afternoon.

    A) 7.2 to 6.7 lb -> 0.5 lb / 15 hr = 0.033 lb/hr

    B) 3.8 to 3.0 lb -> 0.8 lb / 11 hr = 0.072 lb/hr

    C) 2.7 lb to 2.0 lb -> 0.7 lb / 11 hr = 0.064 lb/hr

    I’m suspicious of that low number for the first stay, too. Maybe a side effect of having the cooler’s cavity nearly full of dry ice? Or the freezer ran defrost cycles for the other two?

    Anyhow, to a back-of-the-envelope resolution the cooler loses a bit over 0.05 lb/hour of dry ice. Call it 15 hr/lb.

    The temperature of sublimation is, according to Wikipedia, -109°F. The freezer is around 0°F: a differential of 109°F across 1.5 inches of Styrofoam. Assuming the cooler foam has R=4 with units of (ft^2·hr·°F) / (BTU·in ) and an internal surface area of 304 in^2, the cooler leaks heat at 38 BTU/hr. Call it 11 W.

    Cross check: Wikipedia says the enthalpy of sublimation at STP is 571 kJ/kg. Sublimating 0.07 lb = 0.031 kg requires 18 kJ (18 kW·s) and doing that over the course of an hour requires 5 W.

    Well, considering the rough-and-ready measurements and the fact that the freezer isn’t at STP and that I’m ignoring gas leakage and a bunch of other stuff, a factor of two error is spot on.

    If I were you, though, I’d double-check those calculations before leaping to any particular conclusions. Fair enough?

    When all was said and done, I found this thing in the bottom of the cooler. It wasn’t there when we started, soooo

    Dry Ice Thing
    Dry Ice Thing
  • Sears Kenmore HE3 Washer: Tub Teardown 1

    The discussion following that post prompted me to take a closer look at the corroded spider. I planned to pull the spider off the back of the drum and examine the pieces, but a week of dribbling thread lube around the bolts left two of them firmly affixed.

    While I don’t have it completely apart yet, some observations are in order…

    Spider mounting bolts through drum
    Spider mounting bolts through drum

    The bolts are stainless steel and utterly immovable with the usual screwdriver-handle-mounted Torx bit. I got the first two bolts out by putting a T30 bit in a 1/4-inch socket in a ratchet wrench and applying brute force.

    A few days of thread lube (the incomparable PB B’Laster) persuaded two more out of their lairs. The remaining bolts may require even more brute force, but I’ll give the lube a few more days to work its magic.

    Despite that, the bolts and holes are not corroded. They may have some thread locker down in there, but I see little evidence of that. I think it’s just a case of being torqued down hard, then set adrift in ionic water for half a decade.

    The outer third of each arm has a covering of corrosion products, but the metal below that (now dried and flaking) gunk seems undamaged. The arms have severe corrosion and cracking throughout the inner two-thirds of their length.

    Spider corrosion
    Spider corrosion

    If this were chemical corrosion, I’d expect it to apply evenly throughout the length of the arm, because the presence of corrosion products over the entire arm indicates pretty good distribution.

    However, galvanic corrosion should follow the same pattern, so I’m not sure what to make of this.

    The fact that an oxidation layer on the stainless steel tends to passivate it may not really matter. Compare the surface areas of the drum and the spider: there’s a whole lot more drum than spider, so even a passivated drum could provide enough current to rot the spider.

    The ends of the spider spend their lives whipping through the water inside the tub at a pretty good clip. That could dislodge most of the crud and leave them reasonably clean, at least compared to the hub that moves more slowly (same rotational speed, smaller radius). It’s also true that the water level never reaches the hub, remaining below the level of the door seal.

    Thus, the hub probably gets splashed, but never immersed, and thus has no way to remove any contaminants. The corrosion products simply build up there, keeping it wet throughout its life.

    I maintain there’s little drying going on, even with the door open, in the relatively short intervals between washings. The hub region would be least likely to dry, however, because there’s absolutely no ventilation back there.

    All that notwithstanding, this corrosion should not happen.

    I’d very much like to see some measurements: we’re all obviously guessing at the conditions. The plastic tub surrounding the drum has a port for the rear vent near the perimeter, so it’s possible to get a (cramped, inconvenient) look in there without tearing the washer apart.

    More later, after I get the mumble thing apart…

  • Epson R380 Waste Ink: Gadzooks!

    The amount of ink dumped into the external waste ink tank is staggering. A single head cleaning results in a stream of ink pouring into the tank. After a few weeks of watching that, I stood the tank on end: to my astonishment, the ink pretty much fills the black endcap.

    Waste ink collection
    Waste ink collection

    In round numbers, the cylinder is 40 mm ID and the cap is 20 mm tall. Volume of a cylinder is πr2h, so you’re looking at 25×103 mm3 of waste ink.

    Seeing as how 1 mm3 = 0.001 ml, the tank currently holds about 25 ml of ink!

    The printer has six cartridges. Assuming head cleanings drain an equal amount from each cartridge, that’s 4 ml apiece. Given that the large OEM ink cartridges come with 11 ml of ink, you can do the math: a third of a cartridge of each color just for head cleanings so far.

    I do not object to head cleanings; that’s how they keep all those teeny little nozzles free of gunk. However, coupling that ink usage with minuscule ink tanks is robbery, plain and simple.

    The next time you hear a printer manufacture tout their greenness, you can spit right into their shadow for me.

  • Verizon FiOS: The Truly Fine Print

    The current FiOS triple-play deal is $90/month for two years, plus the usual unknowable taxes & fees.

    The flyer touts numerous advantages, including this bit of seemingly significant numerology (emphasis theirs):

    50X MORE BANDWIDTH THAN CABLE

    America’s top-rated broadband. With FiOS Internet, you get an average download bandwidth capacity per household that’s 50 times that of cable.^

    They used a caret because disclaiming earlier claims had burned through *, †, and ††.

    Anyhow, the ^ leads you to this baffling explanation:

    Based on FiOS GPON download access network bandwidth capacity of 2,400 Mbps and 32 households & cable capacity of 160 Mbps and a typical node size of 125 households for DOCSIS with 4 bonded channels.

    Now, if that doesn’t make you all giddy with desire and admiration, I don’t know what will.

    The numbers don’t quite work out, but that’s in the nature of advertising. The upstream bandwidth oversubscription seems to be:

    • FiOS: (15 * 32) / 2400 = 0.2
    • Cable: (15 * 125) / 160 = 11.7

    Ratio: 58.6. If you assume the cable cap is 12 Mb/s, the ratio is 46.8. Evidently, Verizon puts the cable cap at exactly 12.8.

    A bit of rummaging shows that FiOS generally uses BPON, with a downstream limit of 622 Mb/s downstram, which would give a non-bragworthy ratio of 1.25. Whether we have GPON running past the house is unknowable.

    They’ve eliminated all the kickbacks and incentives, so $90/month now seems to be the standard FiOS triple-play price. If we actually wanted TV, it would be attractive.

    As you might expect, there’s another bold claim sporting a double caret (^^) further down the page.

  • American Standard Elite Kitchen Faucet: More O-ring Troubles

    Half a year after replacing the O-rings on the kitchen faucet, it’s dribbling again. This time, the symptom looked like a leak from the top of the faucet, which implied the three O-rings on the Spacer plate rather than big O-rings that seal the spout.

    You can see the O-rings look different on the old and new spacers …

    Old and New Faucet Spacers
    Old and New Faucet Spacers

    Indeed, the old O-rings are flattened out. It’s most visible over on the right edge of the lower ring; the top ring is new.

    Flattened O-ring
    Flattened O-ring

    Replacing them is no big deal; follow the directions in the earlier post to get everything apart. But: only half a year?

    Here’s a view of the diverter on the back of the column.

    Diverter viewed in mirror
    Diverter viewed in mirror

    Notice that the larger O-rings that seal the spout to the column had glued themselves to the column and left shreds when I removed them. A narrow strip of Scotch-Brite scouring pad, applied shoe-shine style, cleaned the O-ring debris off the column and made it nice & shiny. I suppose as long as they slip freely on the spout, then it’s all good, but there are new ones in place now.

    I used a bit more silicone grease on the O-rings this time; we’ll see if that makes it better or worse.