The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning

Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.

Category: Electronics Workbench

Electrical & Electronic gadgets

  • OMTech 60 W Laser vs. Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Long Pulse Duration Power

    OMTech 60 W Laser vs. Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Long Pulse Duration Power

    The Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter is severely underqualified to measure the OMTech 60 W laser’s beam power, because the laser’s 1 ms minimum manual pulse width isn’t much shorter than the sensor’s 1.5 ms risetime and the maximum beam power is far too high for the sensor’s health. With that in mind, I set the PWM power to 50% = 30 W (grossly too high) and looked at the peak output voltage for a series of (far too long) pulse widths:

    Rounding the detector sensitivity to 11 V/J says the 1.3 V peak at 5 ms corresponds to 120 mJ and 24 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 5ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 5ms

    The 3.3 V peak at 10 ms is 300 mJ and 30 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 10ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 10ms

    The 3.4 V peak at 15 ms is 310 mJ and 21 W suggests the PWM power output is not nearly as constant as one might expect, although the pulse width looks fine:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 15ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 15ms

    The 6 V peak at 20 ms is 550 mJ and 27 W, although the on-screen display obscures the top:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 20ms OSD
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms OSD

    Another 20 ms pulse without the OSD produces a peak eyballometrically close to 6.4 V for 580 mJ and 29 W:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 20ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 20ms

    The KT332N controller in the OMTech 60 W laser has a pulse duration setting showing tenths of a millisecond, but (based on some additional measurements) the beam power can vary by 25% for successive pulses in the low millisecond range, so the pulse width resolution doesn’t seem to provide useful control.

    Despite the over-long pulses, the calculated power corresponds surprisingly well with the nominal laser output power.

    The 1 ms pulses used in LightBurn’s Dot Mode are consistent enough to punch essentially identical 0.2(-ish) mm holes in manila paper to mark the graticule:

    OMTech 60W laser - beam alignment - focus detail - 2022-03-22
    OMTech 60W laser – beam alignment – focus detail – 2022-03-22

    They’re on 0.25 mm centers, with slight variations showing the difference between stepper resolution and positioning accuracy. The shorter graticule lines have three holes on one side of the center lines and four on the other, despite the design’s 1 mm length on both sides; I think there’s a missing dot on the side where the head starts the line, perhaps due to a picket-fence error.

    The large beam hole came from two 10 ms pulses, one at the focal point and another 10 mm lower.

  • Kukoke Outlet Timer: Over-powered Zener Diode

    Kukoke Outlet Timer: Over-powered Zener Diode

    If the title seems familiar, it’s because there’s no visible difference (apart from the “brand name”) between the Enover timer that failed a little over a year ago and the Kuoke timer that recently failed:

    Kukoke timer - overview
    Kukoke timer – overview

    That’s what it looked like after the repair. Prior to that, it’s just a blank display with no response to any inputs.

    Given identical hardware, the overheated phenolic PCB under the Zener diode came as no surprise:

    Kukoke timer - zener heat death
    Kukoke timer – zener heat death

    As promised, though, this time I epoxied a brass shim heatsink to the new diode in hopes of cooling it enough to live long and prosper:

    Kukoke timer - zener heatsink
    Kukoke timer – zener heatsink

    I suppose I must now preemptively affix heatsinks in the two surviving timers, because we all know how their stories will end.

  • Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Specs

    Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Specs

    The Gentec ED-200 optical joulemeter from the Box o’ Optical Stuff is so thoroughly obsolete that no datasheet exists for it anywhere online:

    Gentec ED-200 - measurement setup
    Gentec ED-200 – measurement setup

    The best I could come up with, after many dead ends, is a 2001 capture from gentec-eo.com at archive.org with the barest hint of specifications:

    Gentec ED-200 specs
    Gentec ED-200 specs

    The Max Energy Density spec suggests longer pulses are allowed to deposit more energy, probably because more time gives thermal diffusion an opportunity to spread the heat across the target; at CO₂ laser wavelengths that may not apply.

    With the platform lowered as far as it goes, the ED-200 is 130 mm below the laser nozzle where the beam diameter is about 6 mm for an area of 0.3 cm². Ignoring the ideal Gaussian beam profile by smearing 60 W uniformly across the circle gives a power density of 200 W/cm², which means the laser pulse must be less than 0.5 W·s / 200 W = 2.5 ms to stay inside the power density limit.

    I sincerely hope Gentec overbuilt and underspecified their detector.

    Also, there’s a useful overview document from Genetc-eo.com, wherein it is written:

    The Voltage Response
    The result is a voltage pulse that rises quickly with the response time of the device to a level proportional to the laser energy (Figure 2). It then decays exponentially over a longer period of time that is a function of the pyroelectric device and load impedance. Figure 2 also shows that there is a longer recovery time to return to the initial state of the detector. This is a function of thermal phenomena and is not affected by the load impedance as are the rise and decay times. The integrated pulse energy over this period is proportional to the peak voltage.

    Pulse Width Versus Rise Time

    Usually the applied laser pulse must be shorter than the rise time of the detector for all of its energy to be represented by the peak voltage. Pulse energy received after the detector voltage has peaked will not be fully integrated into that value. For very long pulses, the peak voltage will actually represent peak power rather than pulse energy.

    Gentec Energy Detectors, page 2

    Figure 2 shows the overall waveform:

    Gentec Energy Detectors - Figure 2
    Gentec Energy Detectors – Figure 2

    Which looks a lot like this 10 ms pulse at 50% duty cycle:

    Gentec ED-200 - 60W 50pct 10ms
    Gentec ED-200 – 60W 50pct 10ms

    The pulse was 10 ms long, much longer than the 1.5 ms ED-200 risetime spec, but the overall shape looks right. Dividing the 3.3 V peak by the detector’s 10.78 J/V calibration value (11 J/V works for me) says the pulse delivered 300 mJ = 300 mW·s. Dividing 300 mJ by 10 ms gives 30 W, a beam power astonishingly close to the expected value.

    The OMTech laser has a nominal 60 W output, although the tube life drops dramatically with regular use over 70% = 40 W. Power does not scale linearly with the laser tube current displayed on the power supply milliammeter, with the maximum value presumably preset to the tube’s 20 mA limit producing 60 W. The 20 kHz PWM duty-cycle chopping applied by the controller should linearly scale the average power downward from there.

    It looks like the ED-200 might deliver reasonable results for millisecond-scale pulses at low PWM duty cycles, but it was obviously intended for much milder lasers.

    On the other paw, it’s fully depreciated …

  • Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Accessories

    Gentec ED-200 Optical Joulemeter: Accessories

    The Box o’ Optical Stuff disgorged an ancient Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter:

    Gentec ED-200 - measurement setup
    Gentec ED-200 – measurement setup

    It’s an optical pyrometer producing, sayeth the dataplate, an output of 10.78 V per joule of energy applied to its matte black absorber. Whether it’s accurate or not, I have no way of knowing, but aiming the business end toward the sun and waving my fingers over it produced a varying voltage, so there was hope.

    It has a 1/4-20 socket on one side and my spare magnetic mount expects a 3/8 inch rod, so I drilled a suitable hole in a suitable aluminum rod and cut the head off a suitable bolt:

    Gentec ED-200 mounting rod - parts
    Gentec ED-200 mounting rod – parts

    A dab of Loctite intended to secure bushings completed the assembly:

    Gentec ED-200 mounting rod - assembled
    Gentec ED-200 mounting rod – assembled

    I later replaced the nut with a finger-friendly nylon wingnut.

    Which allows a measurement setup along these lines:

    Gentec ED-200 - measurement setup
    Gentec ED-200 – measurement setup

    The white disk atop the sensor is a homebrewed target to indicate the active sensor area and its center point:

    Gentec ED-200 target - scorches
    Gentec ED-200 target – scorches

    The 1 mm graticule lines give a jogging suggestion to hit the center, assuming you (well, I) manage to hit anywhere on the target at the first shot. The beam is supposed to fill most of the central region, which is obviously not going to happen here, and it must not be focused to a pinpoint. The previous owner (or his minions) put a few scars on the surface and I expect to make similar mistakes.

    Early results look encouraging:

    Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter - first pulse
    Gentec ED-200 Joulemeter – first pulse

    The SVG image as a GitHub Gist:

    Loading
    Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
    Sorry, we cannot display this file.
    Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

    I added the two mounting ears in anticipation of putting the joulemeter in the beamline between the mirrors to measure their loss.

  • Figaro TGS5042 CO Sensor

    Figaro TGS5042 CO Sensor

    The hallway fire detector recently told us it scented carbon monoxide, but we hadn’t been doing any cooking or baking (in the kitchen two rooms away), the furnace (in the basement) hadn’t run for a few hours, and nothing else looked like it was on fire. I had recently replaced the alkaline batteries after a similar false alarm a few weeks earlier; it seems the detector failed after half a dozen years or so.

    Tearing it apart revealed something resembling an 18650 lithium cell:

    Figaro TGS5042 CO sensor - overview
    Figaro TGS5042 CO sensor – overview

    Which made no sense, given the circuitry.

    A casual search shows a Figaro TGS5042 is actually a carbon monoxide sensor. I’m mildly surprised enough gas gets through the vents fast enough to produce an early alert:

    Figaro TGS5042 CO sensor - vent detail
    Figaro TGS5042 CO sensor – vent detail

    I tore it apart to reveal a few droplets of whatever the electrolyte might be, so it hadn’t completely dried out.

    The Product Information flyer doesn’t define what “long life” might be, but another page says “10 years”, so apparently the rest of the circuitry failed around a not-quite-dead-yet sensor.

  • Kodak 750H Slide Projector: Tin Whiskers!

    Kodak 750H Slide Projector: Tin Whiskers!

    Mary’s folks asked me to figure out why the carousel on their Kodak 750H projector no longer turned. Some initial poking around suggested a problem with the solenoid, which only clunked when the projector was upside-down on the desk. I thought it might just have gummed up after all those years, but disassembling the thing (per the Service Manual and the usual Youtube videos) produced the root cause:

    Kodak 750H Projector - broken solenoid link
    Kodak 750H Projector – broken solenoid link

    That explained the yellowish plastic fragments rattling around inside.

    As predicted, it’s impossible to remove the solenoid without breaking the equally brittle focus gear in the process:

    Kodak 750H Projector - stripped focus gear
    Kodak 750H Projector – stripped focus gear

    This is a sufficiently common projector to make repair parts cheap and readily available, at least for now.

    Some of the interior sheet metal has a dark surface, likely heavy tin plating, covered with a thick coat of whiskers:

    • Kodak 750H Projector - tin whiskers
    • Kodak 750H Projector - tin whiskers
    • Kodak 750H Projector - tin whiskers
    • Kodak 750H Projector - tin whiskers

    Touching a whiskered surface with masking tape captures the culprits, whereupon zooming the microscope and camera all the way in makes them just barely visible: they’re a few millimeters long and a few atoms wide:

    Kodak 750H Projector - tin whiskers - detail
    Kodak 750H Projector – tin whiskers – detail

    I have surely contaminated the entire Basement Laboratory with tin whiskers. Makes me itchy just thinking about them …

  • B4-size Light Pad: Stabilizing the USB Connector

    B4-size Light Pad: Stabilizing the USB Connector

    What used to be a “light box” had become a “light pad” powered through a USB Micro-B connector on the side. Unfortunately, the pad’s 5 mm thickness allows for very little mechanical reinforcement around the USB jack, while providing infinite opportunity to apply bending force. Over the course of the last half-dozen years (during which the price has dropped dramatically, despite recent events), the slightest motion flickered the LEDs.

    So I squished the jack’s metal shell back into shape, found a short right-angle USB cable, and conjured a reinforcing fixture from the vasty digital deep:

    LitUp LED Light Pad
    LitUp LED Light Pad

    The plate fits under the light pad, where a strip of super-sticky duct tape holds it in place:

    LitUp Light Pad USB jack reinforcement - bottom
    LitUp Light Pad USB jack reinforcement – bottom

    The USB plug fits between the two blocks with hot-melt glue holding it in place and filling the gap between the plug and the pad.

    I’d like to say it’s more elegant than the cable redirection for my tablet, but anything involving black electrical tape and hot-melt glue just isn’t in the running for elegant:

    LitUp Light Pad USB jack reinforcement - top
    LitUp Light Pad USB jack reinforcement – top

    On the other paw, that socket ought to last pretty nearly forever, which counts for a whole lot more around here.

    The retina-burn orange tape patches on the connector eliminate all the fumbling inherent to an asymmetric connector with invisible surface features. The USB wall wart on the other end of the cable sports similar markings.

    The OpenSCAD source code as a GitHub Gist:

    // Bracket to protect USB jack on LitUp LED Pad
    // Ed Nisley KE4ZNU 2022-03-28
    Protrusion = 0.1; // make holes end cleanly
    Pad = [10.0,30.0,1.2];
    Plug = [8.0,10.5 + 0.5,8.0];
    BasePlate = [Pad.x + Plug.x,Pad.y,Pad.z];
    //———-
    // Create parts
    module Stiffener() {
    difference() {
    union() {
    translate([-Pad.x,-BasePlate.y/2,0])
    cube(BasePlate,center=false);
    translate([0,-Pad.y/2,0])
    cube([Plug.x,Pad.y,Plug.z],center=false);
    }
    translate([-Protrusion,-Plug.y/2,-Protrusion])
    cube(Plug + [2*Protrusion,0,Plug.z],center=false);
    }
    }
    //———-
    // Build them
    Stiffener();