The Smell of Molten Projects in the Morning

Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.

Tag: Improvements

Making the world a better place, one piece at a time

  • Laser Cutter: Fourth Corner Fix Summary

    Laser Cutter: Fourth Corner Fix Summary

    A discussion on the LightBurn forum about a large-format machine with a misaligned beam prompted me to think through the whole “Fourth Corner” problem and come up with this summary based on my beam realignment adventure:

    Here’s what I think is going on, referring to the 4×8 foot (!) machine in that discussion and lightly edited to improve readability & fix minor errors …

    Mirror 1 alignment gets the beam parallel to the Y axis, averaged over the gantry travel between front and rear. The path length variation on your machine is four feet.

    Mirror 2 alignment gets the beam parallel to the X axis, averaged over the laser head travel from left to right. The path length variation on your machine is eight feet.

    When the laser head is in the left rear corner, the total path length is maybe a foot or two. When it’s in the front right corner, the total path length is upwards of twelve feet.

    The “Fourth Corner” problem comes from a slight angular misalignment of Mirror 1, because you (and I and everybody) must set it with a maximum path length around four feet (Mirror 1 to Mirror 2 with the gantry at the front end of the machine). But with the laser head in the right front corner, the path length (Mirror 1 to Mirror 3) is three times longer, so the error due to a slightly mis-set angle at Mirror 1 is correspondingly larger.

    A tiny tweak to Mirror 1 changes the spot position at Mirror 2 by very little, but moves the spot at Mirror 3 by much more due to the longer path length.

    Tweaking Mirror 1 cannot compensate for a warped machine frame, but it will get the beam alignment as good as it can be made.

    The next point of contention was my “middle of the mirror” suggestion. AFAICT, the spot burned into the target at each mirror marks only the useful part of the beam with stray energy in a halo around it. Centering the spot keeps that stray energy away from the mirror mounts, so it doesn’t cause unnecessary heating. This will be particularly important with a high-power laser.

    Angular adjustment of each mirror puts the beam parallel to the axes, but cannot also center it on the mirrors. After it’s aligned, the path from the laser tube through the nozzle depends on the position of the tube relative to the nozzle: moving the tube up/down and front/back moves the beam position on the mirrors and through the nozzle, but (in an ideal world) doesn’t change the angular alignment.

    So after aligning the beam parallel to the axes, you must move the laser tube, the mirrors (up/down left/right front/back), and maybe the laser head to center the beam in the mirrors and also in the nozzle. Because we don’t live in an ideal world, moving any of those pieces wrecks their angular alignment, so it’s an iterative process.

    The goal is to reach this point:

    Beam Alignment - Mirror 3 detail - 2023-09-16
    Beam Alignment – Mirror 3 detail – 2023-09-16

    Those are five separate pulses, one each at the four corners and center of the platform.

    The beam then goes pretty much through the center of the laser head and lens:

    Beam Alignment - Focus detail - 2023-09-16
    Beam Alignment – Focus detail – 2023-09-16

    Works for me, anyhow.

  • Layered Paper: Mariner’s Compass in Colors

    Layered Paper: Mariner’s Compass in Colors

    Having recently shotgunned Amazon’s selection of colored art paper, this becomes possible:

    Mariners Compass - inset browns
    Mariners Compass – inset browns

    It’s the same geometry as the plain white layered version, with somewhat more attention to detail, and consists of a dozen layers glued and stacked on an assembly fixture.

    The quilt-block version uses simple layering:

    Layered Paper - Mariners Compass - Beyer 133
    Layered Paper – Mariners Compass – Beyer 133

    No commercial potential, but I like the effect.

  • The Good Old Days Weren’t: Arsenical Poisons

    The Good Old Days Weren’t: Arsenical Poisons

    An entry from The New Garden Encylopedia, copyright 1936 through 1946, gives recommendations for using arsenical poisons in your garden:

    Arsenical poisons
    Arsenical poisons

    My father always said anybody who talks fondly of The Good Old Days wasn’t alive back then. He was and thought things had definitely improved since then.

    Words to live by.

  • Wire Plant Stand Feet

    Wire Plant Stand Feet

    A pair of plant stands from a friend’s collection ended up in Mary’s care and cried out for feet to keep their welded steel wire legs from scratching the floor:

    Wire plant stand feet - indoor stand
    Wire plant stand feet – indoor stand

    Admittedly, it’s not the prettiest stand you can imagine, but the sentimental value outweighs all other considerations.

    The feet are shrink-wrapped around the legs with enough curviness to look good:

    Wire plant stand feet - show side view
    Wire plant stand feet – show side view

    With a drain hole in the bottom to prevent water from rusting the wires any more than they already are:

    Wire plant stand feet - show bottom view
    Wire plant stand feet – show bottom view

    I briefly considered a flat bottom at the proper angle to sit on the floor, but came to my senses; it would never sit at the proper angle.

    The end results snapped into place:

    Wire plant stand feet - indoor detail
    Wire plant stand feet – indoor detail

    Of course the other stand, at first glance identical to the one above, has a different wire size and slightly different geometry, which I only discovered after printing another trio of feet. Changing the appropriate constants in the OpenSCAD program and waiting an hour produced a better outcome:

    Wire plant stand feet - outdoor stand
    Wire plant stand feet – outdoor stand

    Living in the future is good, all things considered.

    The OpenSCAD code as a GitHub Gist:

    // Wire plant stand feet
    // Ed Nisley KE4ZNU
    // 2024-11-06
    Layout = "Show"; // [Show,Build,Leg,LegPair,FootShell,Foot,Section]
    /* [Hidden] */
    ID = 0;
    OD = 1;
    LENGTH = 2;
    TOP = 0;
    BOT = 1;
    FootLength = 30.0; // vertical foot length
    LegRings = // [255.0,350.0,300.0]; // top dia, bottom dia, vertical height
    [260.0,312.0,300.0];
    WireOD = //4.6 + 0.4; // oversize to handle bent legs
    5.7 + 1.0;
    DrainOD = 4.0; // drain hole in the bottom
    LegWidth = // [65.0,9.7]; // outer width at top & bottom
    [95.0, 12.0];
    LegAngle = atan((LegWidth[TOP] – LegWidth[BOT])/(2*LegRings[LENGTH]));
    StandAngle = atan((LegRings[TOP] – LegRings[BOT])/(2*LegRings[LENGTH]));
    WallThick = 3.0;
    FootWidth = 2*[WallThick,WallThick] +
    [LegWidth[BOT] + LegWidth[TOP]*FootLength/LegRings[LENGTH],LegWidth[BOT]];
    echo(FootWidth=FootWidth);
    NumSides = 2*3*4;
    Protrusion = 0.1;
    //—– Set up pieces
    module Leg() {
    hull()
    for (k = [0,1])
    translate([0,0,k*LegRings[LENGTH]])
    sphere(d=WireOD,$fn=NumSides);
    }
    module LegPair() {
    for (i = [-1,1])
    translate([i*(LegWidth[BOT] – WireOD)/2,0,0])
    rotate([0,i*LegAngle,0])
    rotate(180/NumSides)
    Leg();
    hull() // simulate weld for flat bottom
    for (i = [-1,1])
    translate([i*(LegWidth[BOT] – WireOD)/2,0,0])
    rotate([0,i*LegAngle,0])
    rotate(180/NumSides)
    sphere(d=WireOD,$fn=NumSides);
    }
    module FootShell() {
    difference() {
    hull() {
    for (i = [-1,1]) {
    translate([i*((FootWidth[BOT] – WireOD)/2 – WallThick),0,0])
    rotate(180/NumSides)
    sphere(d=(WireOD + 2*WallThick),$fn=NumSides);
    translate([i*((FootWidth[TOP] – WireOD)/2 – WallThick),0,FootLength – WireOD/2])
    rotate(180/NumSides)
    sphere(d=(WireOD + 2*WallThick),$fn=NumSides);
    }
    }
    translate([0,0,FootLength + FootLength/2])
    cube([2*FootWidth[TOP],10*WallThick,FootLength],center=true);
    rotate(180/NumSides)
    cylinder(d=DrainOD,h=4*FootLength,center=true,$fn=NumSides);
    }
    }
    module Foot() {
    difference() {
    FootShell();
    hull()
    LegPair();
    }
    }
    //—– Build it
    if (Layout == "Leg")
    Leg();
    if (Layout == "LegPair")
    LegPair();
    if (Layout == "FootShell")
    FootShell();
    if (Layout == "Foot")
    Foot();
    if (Layout == "Section")
    difference() {
    Foot();
    cube([FootWidth[TOP],(WireOD + 2*WallThick),2*FootLength],center=false);
    }
    if (Layout == "Show") {
    rotate([StandAngle,0,0]) {
    Foot();
    color("Green",0.5)
    LegPair();
    }
    }
    if (Layout == "Build")
    translate([0,0,FootLength])
    rotate([0*(90-StandAngle),180,0])
    Foot();
  • Curtain Rod Spring Pusher Block

    Curtain Rod Spring Pusher Block

    Spotted during Autumn Window Cleaning:

    Curtain rod pusher block - spring contortion
    Curtain rod pusher block – spring contortion

    That’s the compression spring inside the curtain rod over the kitchen sink, intended to push the ends against the cabinets on either side. The screw slides along the outer rod and when tightened, backstops the spring against the inner rod.

    The end of the spring is apparently intended to twist and jam inside the inner half of the rod, but that seemed so … unesthetic.

    Being in the midst of setting up a Windows 11 box for the laser cutter, I used it as an excuse to fiddle with the RDP configuration to get LightBurn running in full screen mode on the monitor atop my desk; more about all that later.

    The little pusher block is a hull around a pair of circles the same diameter as the smaller dimension of the inner rod, spaced apart enough to match its width, then laser-cut from a scrap of 1/4 inch acrylic:

    Curtain rod pusher block - overview
    Curtain rod pusher block – overview

    Which assembles as you’d expect:

    Curtain rod pusher block - installed
    Curtain rod pusher block – installed

    The spring seems much happier pushing against the block, doesn’t it?

    Admittedly, this was completely unnecessary, but if you think of it as a side effect of the Win 11 thing, it makes at least a little sense.

  • Gizo Spider Footpads

    Gizo Spider Footpads

    Given a 3% failure rate for the tiny footprint of Gizo spider legs, I added 5 mm pads to each foot:

    Gizo Spider - footpads
    Gizo Spider – footpads

    A few rounds of successive approximation and one copypasta hit the right spots:

    // Gizo spider footpads
    // Ed Nisley - KE4ZNU
    // 2024-10-26
    
    pts = [
    [24,-23],[28.5,-7],[29.5,14.5],[20,28],
    [-24,-23],[-28.5,-7],[-29.5,14.5],[-20,28]
    ];
    
    translate([14,0,2.8])
      import("/mnt/bulkdata/Project Files/Prusa Mk4/Models/Gizo Spider/GizoSpider.stl");
    
    linear_extrude(height=0.2)
      for (pt = pts)
        translate(pt)
          circle(d=5,$fn=2*3*4);
    

    Which was enough to stick the legs firmly to the build platform:

    Gizo spider - white leg towers
    Gizo spider – white leg towers

    Talk about blank looks:

    Gizo spider - black on platform
    Gizo spider – black on platform

    White filament is particularly susceptible to charred globbing:

    Gizo spider - white char inclusion
    Gizo spider – white char inclusion

    Which was, fortunately, completely hidden inside the shell.

    Extensive testing showed the pads pushed the error rate below 1.5%:

    Gizo spider pile
    Gizo spider pile

    As before, dots of hot melt glue hold the eyes in place.

    All’s well that ends well: just in time, too.

  • Laser Cutter: Focus Ramp Tests

    Laser Cutter: Focus Ramp Tests

    A few ramp tests with various Focus Distance + Home Offset settings as noted:

    Ramp Test Targets - 14-17 mm
    Ramp Test Targets – 14-17 mm

    The bottom test was at 15 mm, which (contrary to previous estimates) seems to center the narrow band round 0.0 mm. Given the depth of field, a millimeter one way or the other likely doesn’t matter, particularly given the mmm lack of flatness in many materials.

    The controller settings making it happen:

    KT332N Autofocus settings
    KT332N Autofocus settings

    What they mean:

    • Home Offset = distance to retract after the autofocus “pen” = switch activates so the tip of the pen clears the material
    • Focus Distance = distance beyond Home Offset to put the focal point at the surface of the material (or wherever you want)
    • Enable Homing = makes autofocus work at the push of a button
    • Homing Speed = how fast the platform moves while focusing

    Getting the focus right really makes the laser cut like it should!