Ed Nisley's Blog: Shop notes, electronics, firmware, machinery, 3D printing, laser cuttery, and curiosities. Contents: 100% human thinking, 0% AI slop.
It always feels good when the parts fit together, even if they don’t actually do anything yet…
Bare PCB in Wouxun HT battery case
That’s the bare PCB in the first-pass 3D-printed battery case adapter, both of which need quite a bit more work. In particular, the case desperately needs some sort of latch to hold the yet-to-be-built contacts against the HT’s battery terminals.
Amazingly, all the holes lined up spot on, although I think the lower battery contact could move half a millimeter closer to the base of the radio. The battery case contacts are large enough to work as-is and, for what it’s worth, the Wouxun battery cases seem to differ slightly among themselves, too.
The circuit has provision for pairs of SMD caps on all the inputs, with which I hope to squash RFI from both the VHF and UHF amateur bands by choosing their self-resonant frequencies appropriately.
A garden sprayer awaiting repair emerged from the benchtop clutter. It’s an old one, with a metal shell and actual screws, so I could dismantle it to reveal the problem:
Garden sprayer valve – rusted spring
It’s evidently impossible to make a good, cheap, corrosion-resistant spring (pick any two, I suppose):
Garden sprayer valve – wreckage
Some rummaging in the Big Box o’ Medium Springs produced a slightly smaller spring that should last for a while; it’s good, free, and rust-able, if a bit too short.
Much to my astonishment, I found a length of 3/8 inch Marine Bronze rod in the stockpile and made a bushing to take up the remainder of the space:
Garden sprayer valve – new spring and bushing
It won’t get a good test until gardening season opens next year, but it seems to seal well enough.
That’s from Richard Feynman, who should know a thing or two about science and experiments.
The full quote, from a book review in Skeptical Inquirer (Sept/Oct 2011, p 57):
If it disagrees with experiment, it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, how smart you are, who make the guess, or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.
We’ve all encountered folks with beliefs that simply don’t match up with reality; some of them are us. Many such beliefs are non-falsifiable, sometimes carefully phrased that way, making experiment irrelevant.
This brass dragonfly has graced our garden for some years, but what seemed like a gentle tap during fall cleanup knocked both eyeballs out. The original adhesive looked like urethane, so I cleaned the sockets, applied a layer around the rim, and popped the marbles back in place.
Having missed the fall driveway paving deadline, we will have a gravel section in the middle of the driveway until next spring. All the water from the garage downspouts and the back yard runs down the driveway, which dumps it directly into the gravel patch and the new retaining wall’s foundation. That means the gravel patch, at least, will become a mud hole, which I take to be a Bad Thing.
So I bandsawed some 4 inch DWV pipe & fittings in half lengthwise, glued them together as a gutter to capture the runoff and divert it into 80 feet of DWV pipe leading to the bottom end of the wall, then filled the half-pipes with gravel to let us drive right over the whole mess. Unfortunately, the top end of the gravel patch has the driveway ending in broken asphalt, Item 4 gravel, fine gravel, and rubble that make it impossible to snug the pipes up against the asphalt. That means the runoff would pretty much vanish before it reached the gutters.
So I excavated just barely enough gravel to ensure a downhill slope from the remaining asphalt, mixed up a random bag of mortar that’s been kicking around in the garage for a few years, and troweled an apron from the asphalt to the half-pipes. Generally I sign my work, but this kludge need last only a few months and I left it to cure.
The next morning I discovered one of the chipmunks felt the work really needed a signature:
The Moen sink faucet in our black bathroom (so named because of its black tile, white trim, and gray floor) began piddling a few days ago, which seemed odd: Moen says it has a good-for-your-lifetime ceramic valve. So I took it apart, extracting an impressive vector of internal parts in the process.
The “notch” that indicates the hot-cold alignment isn’t particularly obvious, but evidently forward corresponds to the usual hot-on-the-left plumbing:
Moen valve cartridge alignment notch
The retainer clip holding that white stop sleeve in place requires a bit of tweaking from a small pointy probe, but after you expose the hole in that notch the clip comes out easily enough:
Moen faucet retainer clip
With all the frippery out of the way, then “Using pliers, pull the cartridge out of the body by the stem”, which simply did not work for me. No matter what, the cartridge body didn’t budge:
Moen faucet cartridge top
There’s nothing about turning / unscrewing the transparent (looks black here) shell around the stem, so I didn’t try.
Putting enough of the parts back together to keep the cartridge from blowing out in my face (even if I can’t remove it, it’ll certainly blow out on its own), the faucet valve worked fine. You’re supposed to turn the gray pivot retainer 1/4 turn beyond hand tight, which compresses a wavy washer under the retainer. The retainer had been quite loose when I dismantled the faucet, which suggests that either it hadn’t been tightened at the factory or had worked itself loose. That would tend to hold the handle up just a bit, perhaps enough to prevent the valve from completely closing.
After snugging that retainer down tight and reassembling everything, the faucet worked perfectly: happy dance!
I removed the nozzle aerator and found a surprising amount of grit for something that’s downstream of the whole-house water filter and softener:
Flushed with success on the small-hole front, I conjured up a large hole testpiece using the same HoleAdjust function that proved unnecessary with the little ones:
Circle Calibration – solid model
The first version didn’t have the cross bars, which turned out to be a mistake, because the individual rings distorted even under minimal pressure from the calipers:
Large circle cal – unlinked rings
However, measuring as delicately as I could, the holes seemed a scant 0.20 mm too small, more or less, kinda-sorta:
Nominal
Nom+0.0
10
9.83
20
19.75
30
29.85
40
39.84
50
49.84
60
59.72
70
64.76
80
79.28
90
89.77
So I fed in HoleFinagle = 0.20 and the second iteration looks like it’d make a great, albeit leaky, coaster:
Large Circle Calibration object – HoleFinagle 0.20
Measuring those holes across the center with the calipers on facets (rather than vertices), produced somewhat more stable results:
Nominal
Nom+0.20
10
10.08
20
20.17
30
30.08
40
40.08
50
50.00
60
60.02
70
70.05
80
79.98
90
90.07
Frankly, I don’t believe those two least-significant digits, either, because a different set of measurements across different facets looked like this:
Nominal
Nom+0.20
10
10.13
20
20.11
30
29.84
40
39.90
50
49.88
60
59.90
70
69.84
80
79.82
90
89.66
I also printed a testpiece with HoleFinagle = 0.25 that averaged, by in-the-head computation, about 0.05 larger than that, so the hole diameter compensation does exactly what it should.
Applying the calipers to the 10.0 mm hole in the small-hole testpiece gives about the same result as in this one. The fact that HoleFinagle is different poses a bit of a mystery…
The only thing I can conclude is that the measurement variation and the printing variation match up pretty closely: the actual diameter depends more on where it’s measured than anything else. The holes are pretty nearly the intended size and, should the exact size matter, you (well, I) must print at least one to throw away.
All in all, a tenth of a millimeter is Good Enough. Selah.
Oh. The ODs are marginally too small, even using PolyCyl.
The OpenSCAD source, with both adjustments set to neutral:
// Large circle diameter calibration
// Ed Nisley KE4ZNU - Nov 2011
//-------
//- Extrusion parameters must match reality!
// Print with +1 shells, 3 solid layers, 0.2 infill
ThreadThick = 0.33;
ThreadWidth = 2.0 * ThreadThick;
HoleFinagle = 0.00;
HoleFudge = 1.00;
function HoleAdjust(Diameter) = HoleFudge*Diameter + HoleFinagle;
Protrusion = 0.1; // make holes end cleanly
function IntegerMultiple(Size,Unit) = Unit * ceil(Size / Unit);
//-------
// Dimensions
Width = 2.5;
Thickness = IntegerMultiple(2.0,ThreadThick);
DiaStep = 10.0;
NumCircles = 9;
echo(str("Width: ",Width));
echo(str("Thickness: ",Thickness));
BarLength = (NumCircles + 1)*DiaStep;
//-------
module PolyCyl(Dia,Height,ForceSides=0) { // based on nophead's polyholes
Sides = (ForceSides != 0) ? ForceSides : (ceil(Dia) + 2);
FixDia = Dia / cos(180/Sides);
cylinder(r=HoleAdjust(FixDia)/2,h=Height,$fn=Sides);
}
module ShowPegGrid(Space = 10.0,Size = 1.0) {
Range = floor(50 / Space);
for (x=[-Range:Range])
for (y=[-Range:Range])
translate([x*Space,y*Space,Size/2])
%cube(Size,center=true);
}
//------
module Ring(RingID,Width,Thick) {
difference() {
PolyCyl((RingID + 2*Width),Thick);
translate([0,0,-Protrusion])
PolyCyl(RingID,(Thick + 2*Protrusion));
}
}
//------
ShowPegGrid();
union () {
for (Index = [1:NumCircles])
Ring(Index*DiaStep,Width,Thickness);
for (Index = [-1,1])
rotate(Index*45)
translate([-BarLength/2,-Width/2,0])
cube([BarLength,Width,Thickness]);
}